Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login

My Cunt My Cunt My Cunt

October 4th 2006 02:12
The school girls at the train station roared with delight at what they found when they repeatedly yelled out “Mike Hunt.” Onlookers frowned and looked away either as a sign of disapproval, or, as in my case, to resist bursting into laughter themselves.

The strength of the word cunt lies in it’s lack of synonyms and the fact that there is only one way to say it. My over-reliance on it is terrible, but there is no other that gives that same punch. No other with such a sharp sound. No other that gets the same reaction. No other with such irresistible childish naughtiness. Another fantastic feature is it’s versatility – someone can act “cuntish” or be “a real cunt;” if my friend tells me her car broke down I can say “what a cunt!” and if you take to rhyming sang why not use a sentence like “he’s a bit of a James Blunt”?

Many have inquired as to why the most barbaric and filthy English word is slang for that part of a woman’s body that defines her womanhood – a part of her body where we all came from in the first place.

But attitudes to the powerful expression are changing, and the taboo is shifting. Women are using it more and more, and some say it’s an act of rebellion against the strict patriarchal system that makes it such an insulting word in the first place. The idea is that by overtly using it they can break down its impact (like the gay community reclaiming ‘queer’, lesbians using ‘dyke’ or African-Americans using ‘nigger’). Radical
brooch from 77 Industries: www.seventy-seven.net/brooches.html
feminists, however, have continued to try to outlaw the use of the word completely, arguing that it is an act of hostile misogyny and no woman could possibly like that fact that her genitalia should be consigned as crude, vile and ugly in a way that nothing else is.

To this one might point out that the word is actually not insulting in any literal sense, in much the same way as calling someone a 'fucker' isn’t offensive literally. But perhaps it is more complex. We all remain stupidly ill at ease with the vagina. While breasts are now so visible they’re boring, the female genitalia is mostly kept out of sight. Nobody knows what to call it – a 'fanny' belongs to a little girl, a 'pussy' to a porn star, and 'vagina' is too medical.

‘Vagina’, in fact, is especially inappropriate because, as Germaine Greer has pointed out, it refers only to a specific internal section of the genitalia, not the "fun bits". Further, she says, because it is derived from the Latin word for ‘scabbard’ (sword sheath), it is completely inappropriate: "I refuse to think of my sex as simply a receptacle for a weapon."

The trend towards the word cunt has occurred simultaneously to the trend for women going to strip clubs and consuming more pornography. It’s all part of an attitude that goes against those perceivably humourless, joyless, sexless, serious and preaching “feminists” of earlier generations. But is it a sign of liberation or are we being fooled?

Ariel Levy explored the rise of “raunch culture” in the West, and feminism’s shifting position towards it, in her recent publication Female Chauvinist Pigs. She says “only 30 years ago, our mothers were burning their bras and picketing Playboy, and suddenly we are getting breast implants and wearing the bunny logo as symbols of our liberation,” and asks how the culture has been subverted so drastically. She traces a general trend that says the feminist project has achieved so much and gone so far that women can finally join the fun: “if male chauvinist pigs were men who regarded women as pieces of meat, we would beat them at their own game and be female chauvinist pigs: women who make sex objects of other women and of ourselves.” She concludes that while women might feel they are doing something fun, liberating and rebellious, it does not mark the end of objectification or misogyny, and we must continue to fight for freedom and power on all levels.

I wonder what she would think about women using the word cunt…


Two-Faced Cunt by Jake & Dinos Chapman, 1996
Some more from Germaine Greer:

"In the 1970s ... I thought this word for the female genitalia shouldn't be abusive. I believed it should be an ordinary, everyday word. I tried to get people to say it, I tried to take the malice out of it. I wanted women to be able to say it. You think cunt is nasty? I'm here to tell you it is nice like black is beautiful, it is delicious, it is powerful, it is strong. It didn't work and now in a way I'm perversely pleased because it meant that it kept that power."













131
Vote


   

   

   


Comments
21 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Bryn

October 4th 2006 02:46
Didn't Shakespeare use the "cunt" in one of his plays??

Comment by spain01

October 4th 2006 03:16
What a brave person you are! It has been argued that this word is the most powerful in the English language, that its use should be restricted to women, that it should be banned in order to magnify its impact even further. However I am more interested in its etymological derivations. Shakespeare never used the word though it did appear several times in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales which has led to people thinking it was Shakespeare though why I have never been sure. The word came into use in the 13th Century and its origins are disputed. The word made Websters in 1961 but not Oxford until 1972. That says something. The winner I think in my humble opinion is the Latin cuneo v to fasten with a wedge, hence the term cuneiform or wedge shaped. The impact of the word is noted in The Female Eunuch and in a recent film when Jodie Foster is called this word by the Mayor of New York. You may recall the hit musical O Calcutta. I understand that the word Calcutta does not refer to Mombai but rather to the word that inspired this posting.
Question: What German word did 19th Century senior religious Clerics seek to have banned throughout the world because the emotion it designated was so evil? Prize for the person who finds it.

Comment by Cibbuano

October 4th 2006 03:38
I think it's a terrible word to use... there's just that connotation with it, that's it's so derogatory...


Comment by Bryn

October 4th 2006 10:01
weiner?

Comment by ag

October 4th 2006 10:50
Bryn - Shakespeare's Hamlet asked Ophelia, "Lady, shall I lie in your lap?" When rejected, he responded, "Do you think I meant country matters?" and then hammered home that the emphasis should lie on the first syllable, adding: "That's a fair thought, to lie between maids' legs."

Spain01 - I love prizes but I have not idea. Looking forward to finding out ...

Cibbuano - Will using it more not dilute those connotations? I say cunt away ...




Comment by Milly

October 4th 2006 13:43
I agree with Cibbuano. I think it's vulger and foul and every time I hear it I squirm. I don't see the need to use the word because of its shock appeal or because it's naughty. As soon as it comes out of a guy's mouth, I look at them differently....as for when it's from a girl's mouth, I feel repulsed!

Comment by Bryn

October 4th 2006 23:22
One of the reasons why "cunt" and "fuck" are such effective expletives is not so much in what they MEAN, but in the way they SOUND ... Both of them start and finish with a HARD consonant, thus making them extremely gratifiying to the tongue and ear of the person delivering them when pronounced with fervour, and obviously, when heated in anger or frustration, or whatever ... They act like a kind of PURGE; short and hard.
Yet, 'tis strange and disconcerting that one is a word for sexual intercourse and the other is a word for a woman's genitalia - both of which are very nice things - yet are used, mostly, in a derogatory or aggressive fashion.
Language is a virus from outer space.

Comment by spain01

October 5th 2006 21:39
To the list of writers who use this word add Samuel Becket and Phillip Roth

Comment by Howard

October 6th 2006 02:29
But what if the woman (the "c") is a great scientist like nuclear science pioneer Marie Curie? Can we let sexual or biological function really determine us as human beings. Isn't that a form of "racism"?

Comment by spain01

October 6th 2006 05:12
There needs to be a reasonable arguement advanced as to why the word is derogatory towards
the female sex.It may very well be but an arguement is required since so many women, and some of them significant are prepared to use the word. Like most words it is offensive in context. Among indigenous people it is used as common parlance not that this does not mean it is degrading to the female sex since it might be argued that the speech of disadvantaged people reflects the disadvantage.

Comment by Adrian

November 8th 2006 14:32
Just wanted to add that this was another great article, Ag. Enjoyed your thoughts on the lack of alternatives, and am inclined to agree that the word should be used more often, to rid it of overtones.

"James Blunt" I learned from Dave Callan, a radio announcer on Triple J. And incidentally, he operates on a three fucks and you're out rule, and I reckon he's soft on cock, but he'll only give you one cunt before he hangs up on you.

No idea what the answer to spain01's question is. But isn't the word "fuck" German in origin? (The verb "fikken" or something?)

Comment by Bryn

November 9th 2006 22:10
Adrian,
that's what I thought too ... Old German word meanign 'to strike" ...?

Comment by ag

November 10th 2006 22:46
According to this audio sound file, usage of the word fuck, you're right about it coming from the German 'fikken'.

PS the statement that Dave Callen will "only give you one cunt before he hangs up on you" made me chuckle

Comment by spain01

November 10th 2006 22:57
Are women permitted to use the word in a moment of passion and if so in what context? Example?

Comment by ag

November 10th 2006 23:29
It's a great word to use in moments of passion like frustration and anger, but I think you mean sexual passion?

Women are permitted to use it whenever they want although I find the over-use of it in pornos tedious. Porn is boring anyway, but that's another story. I imagine a lot of men would feel uncomfortable with a woman referring to her cunt during sex? But that's just further evidence of the ineffability of it.

Any more hints about the German word?

Comment by spain01

November 11th 2006 03:39
Sorry to be so obscure and not very tantalising. I have already done a post on it which you might like to comment on because the word is Schadenfreude which the German clerics tried to ban in the 19th Century

Comment by Bryn

December 19th 2006 07:27
What about "quim" ...? I've always found that particular reference to the cunt as intriguing ... what are it's origins? And what about "snatch" and "box"?

Comment by The Voices in my Head

December 20th 2006 00:33
AG,
I had to come see what all the fuss was about. I am glad I did. I understand the point of this post, and certainly do appreciate it. It is very well written. But it hasn't changed the connotation of the word for me. To be fair to you and your efforts here, nothing will.

I don't know why it repulses me. I am a very sexual being and I believe in feminism. I do not find sex to be dirty in any way, but that word makes me want to vomit. I do not see someone who uses it, regardless of their reasoning, as an intelligent person. I instantly regard them as backwoods, guttertrash, etc. It's not intentional. It is an honest reaction to the word itself. So, yes, I suppose the word is powerful, but I don't personally believe it is powerful in the way you suggest.

I think the word itself may be more appealing for use by those sorts who look down on women and now have a reason to use it in a 'legitimate' way. I have seen an example of this here on Orble, in fact, from another blogger.

I believe feminism is about striving to force men to see women as more than a framework for that which lies between their legs. I don't think the use of words like 'cunt' helps to accomplish that, just as I do not believe that African Americans have accomplished anything by using the word 'nigger' or lesbians, 'dyke'. I think it cements the discrimination of those groups.

However, again, very well written. I see why you have been nominated. Congratulations!

Voices~

Comment by ag

December 20th 2006 10:14
Hi Bryn. I have never heard of quim - tell me more...

VIMH - thanks for your thoughts. Your repulsion is what I'm talking about when I say the word is powerful. But it's not something intrinsic in the word - it is, as you say, the connotations it carries. And connotations can and do change over time, which I think we are seeing with the word cunt.

I'm glad you stopped by to read. I have to ask you - nominated for what?

ag

Comment by The Voices in my Head

December 25th 2006 00:21
For post of the year! :c)

I can't find the link but there's a Best of Orble 2006 awards and this post was nominated as the best written.

Voices~


Comment by Ann 1

February 23rd 2008 01:50
ag,

To this day, 'My cunt ... ' remains the best post ever put on Orble. (comments section included).

Ann Onnamuss.

More Posts
2 Posts
2 Posts
4 Posts
83 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

ag's Blogs

0 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
0 Post(s)
0 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
0 Post(s)
Moderated by ag
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]